Decision

There’s no one awake right now (incredibly), and I need to work out some things which have been rolling around in my head.  They’re making too much noise for me to fall asleep right away.

My interview is tomorrow morning, and I don’t know what to expect.  It’s something that will cause me to grow, and it’s in a place I have wanted to return to for many years now.

The last program I had open tonight was iPhoto, and the pictures of last Christmas at my in-law’s house.   My nieces and nephews filled the screen, rolling around on the floor with Frank just before New Year’s.  Maternity clothes. A new property. A place we both love, but feel estranged from.

Time has not flown by, it’s gone by a day at a time, in neat 24 hour intervals.  God has used it to bring us my health, and our kids, our home, and our neighborhood.  I’m using the possessive pronoun intentionally to describe our lives, because they are our lives.  We’re responsible to them, thankful for them, blessed by them, in love with them.  And we may be leaving them.

One way or another, I’m going to read this later and cry.  Not just because I’m getting more emotional, but I’ll either be laughing so hard at the things I held up as barriers to our move, or I will be laughing at myself for getting my hopes up.  The last time was so emotionally draining, and I told myself I didn’t want to go through that again.  

I laughed so hard the night I was asked, because of God’s sense of humor: a guy with a “perfect life” gets offered the one thing he’s wanted for a long, long time, but has to leave a big part of that life to get it.  

So I don’t really have a decision to make yet, because it’s only Thursday night.  A few more days and maybe I’ll have a decision to make, but probably I’ll just have more things rolling around in my head, stealing sleep from me, making me visibly preoccupied. I’d like to share this letter with a few friends, but there’s too much I don’t know yet.

There’s one thing I’d like to avoid:  hurting the friends I love by moving away.  Years ago I prayed that God would provide these friends, and he answered plentifully.  I’d like to not damage those friendships, but that’s outside of my control, too.

Pennsylvania.  It’s the statehood equivalent of Shel Silverstein’s “the Giving Tree,” having given so freely of its natural resources for generations.  Its ridge and valleys are a sign that I’m where I belong.  Its purple hued evenings reveal that I am halfway between Center County and the Water Gap.  The glens of rhododendrons on the north facing slopes tell me it’s so cold my nose is going to hurt.  

I miss it every time I return to see...family.  A slew of nieces, nephews, and new land to either make memories or miss out on entirely.  All the things I saw when iPhoto launched 45 minutes ago.

If you’ve seen me over the last decade, you’ve seen me miss being “back east.”  So maybe I’ll just keep missing it, or maybe not.  Maybe I’ll find out tomorrow.  

-sw

The Game of Life, Modern Edition

It was so hot today, my inlaws and I sat in their air conditioned, recently remodeled kitchen with an old school Milton Bradley classic, The Game of Life.

After a few beers, my father-in-law Frank landed on a Payday space, then told me (I was the official banker) to only give him half his paycheck, since the other half was already tied up in gas, groceries, and “friggin’ taxes.”  

“...And while you’re at it, banker boy, maybe we should count what’s left in yer bank and make sure you’re not skimming any off the top.”  Frank is frank.

As I counted out the musty Life-money from the till (he wasn’t kidding about my bank audit), I began to wonder--what would The Game of Life look like if it were played by modern rules?  Here’s a few ideas:

The college career path:
Automatically pay to get an advanced degree, but since there are no jobs in the field in which you majored, you end up with a lower salary working as either a barrista, seasonal employee at UPS, or interning at the company that could have afforded to hire you 10 years ago.  Student loans eat away at Paydays for the 15 turns.

The career path (no college)
Land a fat union or government sector job, put in a short work week with awesome benefits, and make a higher salary.  However, toward the end of the game, your retirement pension is unexpectedly taken away and you have to play for an additional 25 turns.

All the game pieces are SUV’s, and they’re too big to fit on the board.

The first 7.5 Paydays of the game go directly to federal taxes.

Instead of “Get Engaged,” there are spaces for “Get a Roommate” and for “Live Together.”

“Buy a House” is replaced by “Live at Home even though you’re 35”

If you decide to get married, you can place either a pink or a blue game piece in the passenger seat.

“Share the Wealth” cards are replaced by “Mooch” cards.

There are 12 “Lose your Job” spaces on the board.

Just as in the regular Game of Life, the Modern Edition would have “Life” tiles.  These include:

Stimulus Package!  Collect 1000

Your Child “Needs” Lollapalooza Tickets!  Pay 500

Get Visible Tattoo!  Pay 500

Remove Visible Tattoo!  Pay 1500

Enroll in Therapy!  Pay 5000

Caught Illegally Downloading Music and Made an Example of!  Pay 250,000 and lose a turn

Supreme Court Makes Your Livelihood Obsolete!  Change Careers

Inheritance!  Collect 100,000.  Pay half in taxes

Adopt a Rescue Animal

Get Divorced.  Pay 10,000

Remarry your “Soul Mate.”  Collect 1000 from each player

Taxes Due!  Pay 4x the amount of the depreciated value of your home

Car Accident!  Pay 40,000 to replace your car because the other driver wasn’t insured


I ran a few of these ideas past Frank, who grunted something about being pretty clever and then cracked another PBR and told me he was “keeping an eye on the bank, unlike those SOB’s on Wall Street.”  

Oh, one more thing.  There’s no physical game board, spinner, or game pieces--just a download from the iTunes store, and you’re alerted via SMS that it’s your turn to move.

I guess it’s my turn.  Happy Fourth of July.

Betty Crocker hates me

When I work on construction projects around the house, I always take off my wedding ring.  My hands usually swell up, and taking it off early beats watching my ring finger turn purple.  Sometimes I don’t put it back on right away, because it takes a day or so for my hands to get back to their normal shape.  And it was sunny out, so my tan line went away.  

That’s the reason Betty Crocker hates me.

It was one of those Sunday afternoons when time doesn’t matter.  My wife and I (did I mention I got married?) stopped at a little country store on the way back to her sister’s place, hoping to find a housewarming gift for her.  We’d just pulled into the gravel parking lot when she got a call from her mom, so I made the whole silent “I’ll-go-in-and-meet-you-in-a-second” gesture while she took the call.  

I’ve been going to Wilbur’s Country Store since I was a kid, but hadn’t been back in over a year.  The creaking wood floor, the penny candy, the housecat in the window next to the space heater with a wire pet fence around it hadn’t changed, but there was one notable difference--Wilbur had been replaced by a woman.  

She was about my age, with long dark hair and an accent that definitely was more “old Jersey” than “New Jersey.”  In the few minutes of small talk as I browsed the well-dusted shelves, we established that she was Wilbur’s daughter, had just moved here, and that she’d been willed the store after his passing.  I offered condolences, she said thank you for my kindness, and told me she was considering staying stateside once her father’s affairs were settled.

It was about this time that I settled on a Betty Crocker cookbook for my sister in law and was walking it to the register.  To be polite, I introduced myself, extending my right hand, while placing the cookbook with my well tanned, non-ring bearing, still slightly swollen left hand on the counter.  

“Hi, I’m Scott.”

“Betty,” she replied.

“Like Betty Crocker?”  I joked, glancing at the cookbook.

“Yes, like Betty Crocker,” she laughed.

“Well then, I should have you autograph this!”

In all fairness, I really was just being polite, so I was surprised to see her open the cookbook and begin to write down her phone number and the words “I hope you...” on the dust jacket.

Just then, the little silver bell above the screen door chimed and my beautiful wife walked in, placing her hand on my shoulder on a familiar gesture while Betty’s face clouded over.  Betty quickly completed the note, closed the book, rang up my purchase, and gave my wife a cold glance as she wished us a “good afternoon.”

It turned out to be a strange housewarming gift.  Imagine my sister-in-law’s face when she opened the cookbook, only to read the inscription:

“I hope you... burn down your kitchen!” --Betty Crocker
908-362-8833

Stand Your Ground, Check Your Facts

Only two people really know what transpired the night Trayvon Martin was shot and killed by George Zimmerman in Sanford, Florida, and only one of those is still alive.  There has been no proven account released about the events of that evening, though many on both sides would like to fill in the blanks with what they think they know due to each party’s background and culture.  

On one hand, a black kid wandered into the wrong neighborhood and got targeted by an overeager neighborhood watchman in yet another racially motivated killing.  On the other, a community protector was threatened and assaulted in an act of aggression, and took the appropriate measures to defend himself.  Race, discrimination, justice, fear, protection, defense, and aggression--all apparently play a significant role in the unofficial record of that evening.  For some, “a Mexican killed a black kid” is enough to compartmentalize the whole affair.  Others seek to find meaning behind the shooting, while others use the exchange to further their journalistic or political careers.

For all the allegations, we only truly know a young man is dead, and the shooter is seeking protection behind a controversial legal standing known as “Stand Your Ground."  But with all of the controversy surrounding race, inequality, and social justice surrounding the shooting, what is the real issue at hand?  

In 2005, Florida’s first female NRA president Marion Hammer pushed for and won a vote on the now widely publicized Stand Your Ground Law.  According to its preamble, the law is intended to  provide direction regarding “Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.”  But how does it apply to issues of protection outside the home, or where perception of harm cannot be proven?  

According to preliminary reports released on 911 calls, Zimmerman pursued Martin through his neighborhood on suspicion of looking unfamiliar and sketchy.  That’s where the official record ends, and it’s not the public’s role to speculate about events after this point.  Because of the official photos circulated of Zimmerman and Martin, we’re left to see Zimmerman as a heavyset Mexican with a past criminal record, and Martin an innocent young kid with his whole life ahead of him.  But according to a March 31st article by US News, both photos are out of date, and neither image fairly represent either.  Based on public outcry and the limited factual record,we’re left with a skewed perspective on the case.  It’s simply not fair to either party to engage under the auspices of pretending we have the moral high ground of knowing all the facts.

Apart from the events of that evening, one issue which remains unclear is the interpretation of the SYG law.  If records of Zimmerman pursuing, and then initiating, a conflict with Martin are founded in truth, then this law fails to be an accurate statute behind which a plausible legal defense can be made.  As a practical point, picking a fight precludes the use of SYG as a realistic defense strategy.  It is meant to protect the weak, attacked, and infringed upon, and provide a means to both deter criminal aggression and allow a potential victim to defend himself when necessary, by whatever means necessary.  

In a society where criminal’s rights too often trump those of the victim, SYG allows a person to legally protect themselves when faced with the presumption of great bodily harm.  Whether the law is correctly or incorrectly applied to the Trayvon Martin shooting remains to be seen, but the principle is sound.  As a society so quick to assign blame and innocence in the court of public opinion, we only stand to cause greater damage when we arrogantly rush to say we know best without first being knowledgeable of all the facts.

Re-mission

My strength is returning more every day.  After several months of sickness and side effects, the thing that’s been eating me alive is full, and can eat no more.  My doctor tells me that I am officially in remission.

Recently, I’ve been planning to head down to Working Bikes in Chicago with a cycling buddy for a day of volunteering.  Their mission is re-mission, only theirs is to re-purpose old bicycles that Americans discard and send them off to third world countries, where bikes are sources of transportation and revenue.  I’ve been working on an old 1986 Cannondale I’m planning to donate, a testimony to the fine work that the bike builders in Bedford, Pennsylvania put into their products.  Most of the bike is intact, but after 25 years, it was time for an overhaul.  Like me, after a few painful procedures that tore it open and removed some grime, it was put back together again, nearly good as new.  Both the old green bike and I are ready to get rolling again.  

At the end of the day, the ‘86 will be carefully set aside for loading into a shipping crate.  Now that its re-mission is complete, I hope it is excited as I am to see where it ends up.  It’s tempting to crawl inside the shipping container as a stowaway to see where it goes, who gets it, and how it performs for the next 25 years; but that’s pretty unrealistic. 

Sometimes it’s more fun to make up a story when you just don’t know where things are headed.  

-sw

Pender

“hey, got a minute?... I can’t get the apple logo off the screen of my iPhone.”
“That’s because its backwards.  It’s okay, Pender...everyone does that.”

I cringe every time I hear that question out of Pender’s mouth.  At 53, his anger arrives in a flash, yet he insists on owning devices that frustrate him.  “Got a minute” is his code for: “I have been stumped by this electronic device; now I feel insecure about my age and stupid that I must ask for help.  In order to maintain my appearance of calm, you must make up an excuse that both exonerates me and places the blame squarely on the software developer.”

This is the guy who volunteered to take a picture for a couple wearing Packers jerseys on Navy Pier so he could toss their camera into Lake Michigan and tell them their team sucked.  He continually points out spelling errors, mocking people who fail to follow the “-end in friend” rule.  Waitresses pour drinks in his lap, and nursing mothers call him a pervert.  Our office cleaning lady forks the evil eye and spits at him; and he is no longer allowed inside the Brookfield Zoo after trying to fight a Kangaroo.  He can’t download an email attachment, is repeatedly confused by the three boxes in the upper right right corner of his screen, and often hits “reply all” with inappropriate comments about other people in his email chains.  He’s a real-life Michael Scott, minus the good intentions.

We shared an office for a few years with six other consultants looking to establish an legitimate mailing address.  Pender’s name was supposedly on the lease, and he appointed himself the de facto office manager for a group who neither needed nor wanted office management.  For a while no one minded, until someone brought in brownies on a random Wednesday.  

If you’re familiar with a gluten-free diet, you know that consuming wheat flour can land a person in the hospital.  But not consuming it can also land a person in the hospital, when the person not consuming it starts throwing insults and punches at the well-intentioned baker.  Pender’s anger led to six stitches above his left eye and a broken Keurig, and no question that he resents both his celiac and feeling excluded from the group.  Several consultants moved out, replaced by three new freelancers who looked puzzled upon receiving my warning to never feed the bear.  

Last week, the other tenants decided not to sign a new lease until they’d made a new arrangement with our property manager.  With all of the interpersonal struggles surrounding Pender, it may be tempting to think he is aware of the problem, but he is not.  He’s the product of a dysfunctional home, was never coached to play well with others, and continually plays the wounded victim role to his advantage.  Yet if you ask him, Pender genuinely believes all the blame can placed at another pair of feet, and that he is always in the clear.

Recently, a cop friend told me that in all the times he’s interviewed people after an accident, he’s never heard a person include themselves in their crash stories.  He hears “the other guy cut me off,” or “she just came out of nowhere,” or “they jumped out right in front of me,” but never hears someone admit their own part in being distracted.  For all the words which could be chosen, the most difficult remain the ones which provide a measure of grace to the other party involved.

The Poison Walnut

Along the edge of my Uncle Bob’s sprawling property stood an incredibly beautiful tree.  It was a Black Walnut, and towered over the shallow spring-fed pond that once watered dairy cows and served as a nautical landing pad for area mallards.  

For the first five years I lived there, I would forget about the tree entirely until the third week of August, when my friend Carl would throw one of its green fruits squarely between my shoulders, leaving a dark stain from its hull on whatever shirt he’d just ruined.  His annual first volley sparked a brief but filthy war for the first two weeks of each school year, usually ending only when his alcoholic father sobered up enough to wonder why his son’s new school clothes were peppered with walnut husks, then peppering him with fisticuffs until Carl promised to stop.

In addition to providing plentiful “kid ammo,” the walnut trees also provided a weird side effect--they produced a soil toxin called Juglone, which prevents all but the most tolerant species from surviving near the parent tree.  Staining a new sweatshirt was one thing, but poisoning the orchard was another--we always had enough sense to keep our skirmishes far from our family orchard.  Once the Juglone broke down in the soil, it stayed there for a long time, working through the soil layers until it broke down.  We’d seen the apple trees near the pond Walnut wither and die, and knew that spreading the rotten fruit further would only poison a larger area.  

After she saw its affecting the soil conditions on the nearest row of Heirloom trees, my Aunt Hester finally got pissed enough to cut it down.  She went at the tree with all five feet of her Filipino fury and my Uncle’s new Stihl chainsaw.  After 10 minutes, she dropped it into the pond, then had one of our hired hands wrap a tractor chain around it and drag it to the edge of the road, where she sold it off and made out pretty well. Very few trees fetch a better dollar for lumber than Walnut.

Quite a few people wondered how I’d react, thinking I would miss the tree that had stood on the property my late parents had turned into Quercitin Farms. Quite a few people were surprised that I turned out glad to see it go.  

There continue to be some great bass in the pond below, and I find it’s easier to cast into their favorite spots without that stupid tree getting in the way each day.  With the money that Hester made selling it off, she bought a pair of new four wheelers, which made getting around the farm both easier and more fun.  More than anything, I’m just glad not to have to smell it anymore, or step over it, or spend time working around it.  Lots of people thought it was a great tree, but they didn’t have to live with it everyday.  

A few fun facts about Juglone toxicity, and an odd social parallel:
Juglone poisons the soil and prevents certain species from thriving or surviving.  Some species are completely unaffected due to their genetic makeup.  Some species survive, but never thrive; still other species don’t flourish until the poison is completely gone.

For years after removing a Black Walnut, toxins in the soil persist, and new plants sensitive to their poison will not fare well.  This exclusionary mechanism allows walnut trees to colonize areas and prevent competition, by stifling other species' ability to breathe, survive, or flourish.

When a poisonous social or business attitude persists, it greatly affects the surrounding “ orchards ” and their culture.  For every strong personality who can survive a toxic environment, there is another who is consumed, unless extraordinary outside measures provide support.

The question remains:  for the organization who finds itself growing a Black Walnut, is it better to clean up their droppings each year to limit their poisonous impact, or is it better to cut the tree down, throw a chain around it, and sell it off for lumber?